To quote from my own website,
98% of people who start a diet end up heavier than they started, a year
after they finish. To me, this says that 98% of people are doing the
wrong things, 98% of information in the media is wrong, or 98%
of people who talk about nutrition do not know what they are talking
about. You or a close relative/friend will undoubtedly be able to agree
with this from first-hand experience, too. So we know that standard
diets dont work. But why?
To start with, there are a few
vital principles that must be understood.
- If you take in less calories
than you use, you will lose weight. This weight loss can be from fat or
muscle. Naturally, if you take in more calories than you use, you will
gain weight.
- Your energy needs differ every
day and are made up of three factors around 70% is your Basal Metabolic
Rate, or BMR (the energy you use whilst resting, dependent on your lean
mass/muscle, changes very little each day without extreme changes in
environment); around 10% is from Thermogenesis (heat production,
changes a lot each day depending on what foods you eat, how cold you
are etc); and around 20% is from Specific Dynamic Activity (movement,
changes a lot each day depending on what foods you eat).
- Your body is either in a build
up (anabolic) mode, or a breakdown (catabolic) mode. There is no middle
zone and you will be switching between anabolism and catabolism at
various different points during the day.
- Your body still operates as it
did in caveman times. It will defend its fat stores to improve survival
chances in times of starvation and, upon sensing a deficiency of food,
will adjust metabolism to match food intake. This negates the impact of
dieting.
Unfortunately, most diets and
diet clubs only take notice of Principle Number One. This is a very
narrow-minded view as it ignores the complex systems that make up or
biological structure. Blindly persevering towards an end destination of
a Calorie Deficit at the end of the day is, in the main, a very
pointless exercise as our bodies have a built-in fat defense system to
help us survive in leaner times; this must be taken into account if you
are going to work around it, and get results beyond the first week or
two of a diet (until the fat defense system activates). Generally
speaking, any extreme change - be it a drop or increase in food intake,
temperature or activity levels will necessitate a change in the bodys
function. Bearing in mind Principle Four, it is extremely important to
maintain a normal body function if you are going to lose fat.
Unfortunately, diets that blindly calorie-count almost always see your
body going through sustained starvation (a very stressful infliction on
the system) and this is the perfect recipe for kicking in the Fat
Defense/Metabolism Adjustment.
These diets are normally poorly
arranged to direct a particular calorie intake over a 24 hour period.
Although I accept that you need to have some period to measure intake
by, a whole day is simply too long a spell to work to, and you can
significantly overeat at breakfast and be hungry at lunch here you will
be building fat stores at 7am and then breaking down muscle at 12noon,
both of which will have negative impacts on your body composition. A 24
hour clock will simply not cater for switches in our metabolic
functions that happen from hour to hour.
Some weight-watching clubs
issue points to different foods with the motto "no food is a sin". You
can actually fit in with the ethos of this eating plan by starving
yourself all day until 7pm, when you use up your 15 points in one go on
a well-earned plate of Mars Bars. From 7am-7pm, you have kicked-in your
fat defenses (Principle Four) and so have created the tiniest of
calorie deficits. Then from 7pm-bedtime, you have caused a massive
calorie excess, which will result in definite fat gain. So traditional
dieting can actually make you fatter! Not to mention the problems
caused by hunger, like nervous system stress, poor mood and
concentration. To illustrate the problems with this approach, imagine
you are restricting yourself to 10,500 calories per week (a typical
level for calorie-counting dieters). Because you have eaten 2 takeaway
pizzas on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, each with garlic bread and
Coke, you have now reached your limit. Would you now not eat until the
following Monday? This is exactly what is happening in the diets of
many people, the only difference is this 168-hour rhythm has been
replaced with a 24-hour one.
Naturally, monitoring your food
intake on an hourly or 3-hour basis is also quite inconvenient. But
there is no need anyway. The only time you will get the results you
need is if you deliver the right balance of food to ensure that you are
in a Catabolic(breakdown) mode, as per Principle Three, but without
activating your Fat Defences. So what controls whether we are building
up fat or muscle stores or breaking them down? This is all down to our
blood sugar levels. The amount of glucose (blood sugar) in your
bloodstream is constantly varying. It is increased by food intake,
released mainly from your intestines into the bloodstream, and
decreased by muscle cells that grab energy to replace that which they
have used up in the process of living. If your blood sugar becomes too
high, insulin is released and this will bring down your Blood Sugar
Level however, this energy has to go somewhere and your body cleverly
stores it as fat. (Some insulin is always required however, and in a
normal stuation situation it is mediated within the blood
stream by its opposing hormone, glycagon). Throughout, these rises in
insulin are undesirable. Throughout the course of the day, your Blood
Sugar Level will go up and down and its level dictates the activity of
your metabolism. So it is very important to become at one with!
It is important to understand
the metabolic behavior instigated by your Blood Sugar Level. Whilst
there is naturally less defined borders between some zones (shades of
grey), there are four distinct zones that you will fluctuate through.
Excessive Anabolic Zone
(Build-up Zone) your blood sugar is too high. Your muscles have plenty
of energy available to work with and build in size and strength, but
there is too much energy on top of what is required for this and so
your body will release excessive Insulin to reduce the level. Result: Fat and
Muscle Storage (assuming you have trained hard!).
Moderate Anabolic Zone
(Build-up Zone) your blood sugar is above the level required for
maintenance of living function. This moderate excess gives the muscles
plenty of energy to work with and build in size and strength. Result:
Muscle Storage.
Moderate Catabolic Zone
(Breakdown Zone) your blood sugar is below the level required for
maintenance of living function. This moderate deficit means the body
has to dip into its spare energy stores, fat stored under the skin, but
there is enough energy to maintain normal metabolic function. Result:
Fat Breakdown (assuming you are eating an intelligently balanced diet and there are no other obstacles).
Excessive Catabolic
Zone(Breakdown Zone) starvation. Your blood sugar is too low. This
severe deficit means the body has to steal energy from its stores, but
because your body is now in a starvation state it tries to preserve its
long-term fuel source for as long as possible it will burn more muscle
than fat. From a caveman perspective, the choice to break down muscle
preserves the most valuable resource, fat which improves capability to
walk to the next village/source of nourishment, therefore improving
survival chances. Result: Fat and Muscle Breakdown.
Clearly, the two moderate zones
will improve body composition, whereas the two extreme zones will be
detrimental to body composition. Moderate Catabolism is extremely
beneficial to anyone looking to burn fat. If you stay within this
Moderate Catabolic Zone (Fat Burn Zone) all day you will cause your
body to skim off the top of its fat reserves the fat stored beneath the
skin, also called subcutaneous fat. On a minute by minute basis, you
are not using a lot of fat, but over the course of a day/week/month,
this all adds up to significant progress.
Is
this concept that much
different from the calorie-counting plans? In terms of the desired end
result, no you still achieve a calorie deficit (the target, mentioned
as Principle One), but the difference is that you are not guessing by
numbers and instead responding to your body as you go along, without
activating your bodys Fat Defences. By definition, you will constantly
be running at an energy deficit and so achieve a finite calorie
shortfall at the end of the day. Most importantly, this will have been
done in a healthy way that improves body composition, as the
reserve-energy sources broken down will be almost exclusively fat.
Remember that spending hours carefully counting calories will see you
disrupt your bodys metabolic function, when in reality you just need to
keep your blood sugar at a level where you will be breaking down cells,
but without starving. A more general summary of how to spend the
maximum amount of time in this Zone is to ensure that you are 'never
hungry, never full'. This means 4-6 small meals/snacks in a day, not
three square
meals.
Even knowing this, many people
will execute this Blood Sugar Level Maintenance incorrectly. More often
that not, problems occur when you eat something that destabilizes the
amount of energy in the bloodstream. If you consume sugary or processed
food be it anything from chocolate and sweets to white bread and white
rice it is broken down extremely quickly in your digestive system and,
as a result, released into your blood stream too quickly. Your Blood
Sugar Level rises rapidly (pushing it towards the top of your Excessive
Anabolic Zone) and, in response, a surge of insulin is released; this
avoids sending the body into a sugar-induced coma and takes the energy
out of the bloodstream. But this energy is dumped as fat around the
body, and you are now in a Catabolic zone once again. This is referred
to as a Sugar Spike (due to the swift up-down effect it has on your
Blood Sugar Levels) and is best avoided as, on top of the extra fat you
have now stored subcutaneously, you will now be more tired, more hungry
and will need to eat again sooner a double whammy. It is a good idea to
stick to foods that do not cause a sugar spike.
So what foods should we be
eating? Generally real and natural foods, with plenty of proteins, good
fats (eg seeds, nuts and oils) and complex carbohydrates, as these are
broken down slower. All foods are broken down and released into your
blood stream at varying speeds, and the slower this happens the more
stable your Blood Sugar Levels will stay. Foods can be rated on a scale
called a Glyceamic Index (GI) on the relative speed that they push up
the blood sugar the lower the better. Diets that use GI are generally
well-balanced and valid plans and are worth becoming familiar with.
The other way problems occur is
when we simply eat too much in one meal, thinking we are hungrier than
we really are. Due to unnatural eating patterns and processed junk that
now regularly replaces food in out diets, most (but not all) of the
population have a very poor appetite control function. This can also be
caused by genetics, but this is the case on few occasions. There are
numerous physical, mental and emotional factors that can influence the
appetite of an individual, some beyond the scope of this article, but
two important physical aspects should be understood. When your stomach
is full, it communicates this message with the brain, which in itself
turns off the appetite. So a feeling of fullness in the stomach is
important. But this is itself more of an indication of whether you are
hungry or not a more real measurement is fed back more centrally by
your Blood Sugar Levels.
This means it should be very
easy to judge how much or how little energy you need to move up a zone
or avoid slipping down a zone, but the feedback is not instant. Food
has to be broken down in the stomach and absorbed through the
intestines before it has an impact in your bloodstream; this typically
takes 15-25 minutes. To improve the accuracy of these hunger
indicators, you could try drinking water with each meal to avoid
inaccuracy from the physical sensation in the stomach; to counteract
the delayed reaction in your Blood Sugar Levels, you should try eating
the French way this means very small courses separated by 15-20 minute
breaks, avoiding eating a big plate of food and then being overcome by
bloating (Xmas Day/Chinese Takeaway Syndrome). On a more practical
basis, this may mean eating half of your lunchtime sandwich when you
start to get hungry, waiting 25 mins and, providing you are now
satisfied, eating the other half a couple of hours later.
Once you have understood the
basics, you will find yourself making daily progress. Essentially, what
works within this scientifically-based plan is the exact target of the
calorie-counting plans, but by overcoming the pitfalls it avoids the
innefectiveness that comes with disrupting the metabolic functions of
our bodies, bodies that have been carefully sculpted by evolution to
produce what we have today a perfect survival machine. Unfortunately,
our lifestyles are so out of sync with the daily struggle and sustained
hunt for food that they became so adapted to that our biological
systems now appear to malfunction. Meanwhile, whilst we continue to
drive everywhere and sit behind a desk for eight hours a day, obesity
remains rampant.
Appetite, hunger and survival
are, by nature, very closely linked. Modern lifestyles have separated
the link to some degree but our bodies still function in exactly the
same way. It is by understanding the basic sciences involved in the
mechanisms that control these necessities to life that we can establish
what methods work for fat loss and what methods do not. Keep it
naturally moderate, whilst using the basic principles and progress will
follow on its own accord. The harder you push it, the more likely you
are to take the body into an unhelpful reaction, so settle for
realistic but steady improvements. Its a choice between slow progress
or no progress.